The Civil Engineers at a major Architect/Engineering firm used MSI’s experience and modern methodology to determine the effect of the suction and discharge piping on the structural natural frequencies of a dry-pit non-clog vertical pump which was due for replacement.  Pump OEMs will understandably limit their own analysis efforts to the scope of their supply, and may not include piping effects and/or will assume the floor is infinitely stiff (it isn't).  While leaving out system effects may be fine for a rotordynamics analysis, it makes a structural analysis misleading at best.  The goal of a properly performed structural analysis is to ensure that the pump and associated components will not vibrate based on how the pump, motor, and associated system elements will be installed and behave in the system at various performance conditions.

In this case, by determining the effect of the suction/discharge piping on the natural frequencies of the currently installed pumps, the importance of including this piping in future FEA analysis predictions for the new pumps could be quantified.  The Architect/Engineering firm could then be sure to state in their specification that the suction and discharge piping should be modeled explicitly in any future FEA calculations.

Based on MSI’s FEA models of the full pump assembly, including the suction and discharge piping modeled out to the first rigid support, it was predicted that the added stiffness of the suction and discharge piping did not have a great influence on the 1st bending “global rocking” modes (up to 3.05%), however, the piping had a fairly significant influence on the 2nd bending “C-shaped” modes, up to 18.5%.  For this reason, MSI highly recommended that the Architect/Engineering firm include language in their specification that detailed models of the suction and discharge piping (up to the first rigid support) should be included in any structural natural frequency calculations of the future pump system.

The following table is a comparison of baseline modes and “disconnected suction/discharge piping” modes of a dry-pit non-clog vertical pump assembly in order to evaluate the effects of the suction and discharge piping.

Dry-Pit Non-Clog Vertical Pump Structural Modes: Assessment of Suction/Discharge Piping Effects
Pump Speed (RPM):  1070-1170
Description Baseline FEA Predicted Natural Frequency Natural Frequency without Stiffness Influence from Piping Percent Influence of Piping
1st Bending "Global Rocking" Mode Perpendicular 16.9 1,014 16.4 984 -3.05
1st Bending "Global Rocking" Mode Parallel 18.4 1,104 18.3 1,098 -0.55
2nd Bending "C-Shaped" Mode Perpendicular 29.4 1,764 24.8 1,488 -18.5
2nd Bending "C-Shaped" Mode Parallel 30.8 1,848 27.3 1,638 -12.8

The following image is a Creo 4.0 solid model of the dry-pit non-clog vertical pump assembly used to match the structural natural frequencies measured by MSI in the field.  It should be noted that to obtain a good match with the field measured structural natural frequencies, it was necessary to include the suction/discharge piping, modeled in 3D and fixed at the first rigid support.

full model

For comparison purposes, what follows is a Creo 4.0 solid model of the dry-pit non-clog vertical pump assembly used to assess the effects of the suction and discharge piping on the pump structural natural frequencies.  It should be noted that the boundary conditions shown above are utilized only for comparison purposes.  The correct configuration when performing a pump system structural natural frequency analysis is shown in the first image with a complete model of the surrounding system, including the suction and discharge piping. 

no piping

Let's take a more detailed look at the 2nd Bending "C-Shaped" Mode, where the shift in natural frequency was significant.  The following animation compares the 27 Hz forced response of the no piping model with the correctly modeled system, including suction and discharge piping.

2nd Bending "C-Shaped" Mode response at 27 Hz with no piping

Forced response at 27 Hz for model including piping showing minimal response

The following chart demonstrates the shift in the 2nd bending mode from 27 Hz to 31 Hz with a properly modeled system, including the piping.

Forced Response Shift in Natural Frequency Piping

Finally, the properly modeled forced response at 30.8 Hz is shown, which was not evident using the no piping assumption.

2nd Bending "C-Shaped" Mode response at 31 Hz with piping included

Check out these related case studies to see how the foundation and water level affect your pre-installation analysis as well.

If you would like to discuss pre-installation analysis for rotating machinery with an experienced MSI Engineer, contact us.


MSI In Action

Case Study

New Orleans Flood Control Pumping Stations Vibration Analysis

MSI was recommended to analyze flood control pumping station system dynamics, including evaluation of the platform design with regard to vibration. 

Case Study

Water Treatment Plant Pumps Fail Vibration Specification During Commissioning

A contractor putting together a water treatment facility encountered vibration issues with various pumps during commissioning. 

Case Study

Newly Installed Water Treatment Plant Pumps Cavitating & Vibrating

A county water treatment plant heard “cavitation-like noise” from their newly installed pumps and called MSI for help.